L Jia to be shengxiang? patent infringement the amount of this message to a blockbuster, the end of the year, creating such a piece of information that intention? many people start discussion on this topic, I wondering this lawsuit may be it's off.
Doubt a: focus news broke out, almost zero duration
Results: the title is "l Jia floor sued flooring" brother "prosecution because" shengxiang "infringing" and the article roughly the same there are 10 articles, which hides a story, this is the first of the l Jia sued shengxiang floor floor news. This 10 news including 9 part 1-day publishing information, then press release on the "decline".
From the news, the day is over 6 days. The information on this subject but 3: "l Jia floor sued flooring" brother "," "shengxiang floor being sued for infringement Hangzhou rise better claim 800 million" and "l Jia refused reconciled shengxiang holding private party known as the" small ",". Such centralized publishing the same news, duration and is so short, do not rule out behind the scenes with network marketing company in operation.
Doubtful point two: Action News into the soft article details
From the current understanding of the information, since it is an infringement case, how could this 3 article titles are tightly wound lived up better on the floor? read the news of friends, you can feel it carefully, is not a double soft article feeling? author why not introduce the details of the entire litigation? as a news writer in the face of this litigation the topic of news, it seems unduly favouring l better side. There is no real shengxiang stance also failed to arouse their curiosity, this seems a little sidetracked. The authors of scales, from the outset, the deviation is too unusual. Is it our users were stuffy pot?
Doubt: Why won't you shengxiang mouth
Since there is a dispute, the stabilization of shengxiang why? as a man, being suspicion and made public, regardless of whether a rational will excuse yourself. Is it already see through l Jia Shengxiang's intention, deliberately cryogenic treatment of, or be worried chatter shengxiang, but "with perfection"? currently, we only know to this event, but where the infringement, we specifically are not known, better why words are to the throat of the pharynx back again to a cold heat buildings, in sharp contrast, as the plaintiff's side of the lift, it can be considered selling the answer, so long, have everyone's appetite diaozu. Currently, we only know to this event, but where the infringement, we specifically are not known, better why words are to the throat of the pharynx back again?
Doubt four: lawsuit comes not a moment
In China, after new year's day are companies before internal performance summary, develop new year plans. As a large company, l Jia a Chinese General, is not to wait for a better harvest fruit to? since l better early up against infringement of "legal Panel", then certainly in early 2009, eyeing the pile litigation lawsuit, such a long time why wait for the end of a year, right?, etc, and also care about all these days? did end litigation best period?
Such stabilization of years ago, is already clearly against this lawsuit to fix?, what is waiting for both sides, is fair or promotions?
Event results prediction:
1, reconciliation
This event, the l Jia itself play is the position sign, since it is the position sign, reconciliation is logical. Now l Jia has reached the end, both for the event, reconciliation is the best results. Just worry about l better now that you have mounted the "like" back, look at the scenery, I do not know the "elephant" is willing to give up good ride down to the ground.
2. l Jia Sheng
The event, who is right is not concluded. In the meantime, a patent to speak, apparently promoted better evidence also insufficient, it makes people feel that it just wanted to play. Shengxiang is the oldest, and based on this industry overnight, brands, channels are just do in do it yourself, the rise and fall of shengxiang relates to the whole of China has floor industry development, behind-the-scenes, enables shengxiang infringement or let up better in favour of the conditions is not sufficient for the time being. If, as is the infringement shengxiang, domestic magnates are put down, the next is who is more important, patents and protection of growing, many enterprises have got on the stage?
3, shengxiang Sheng
Shengxiang had disclosed that l Jia said the patent exists, they have already submitted an assessment of the application, that is l Jia also may pay a few million, or right when the advertising costs, but this kind of "advertising" of considerable value. However, losing to rise better image, or a loss of more readily than reconciliation. The shengxiang, he doesn't need to borrow again to fire a, lockers, l better how only to deal with this stand.
As I see it, better be shengxiang's lawsuit, regardless of the outcome, better is always borrow shengxiang smooth position, as regards the effects of not much we can not make evaluation, can only see the last rise better price to be paid to the
Equivalent.
No comments:
Post a Comment